INDEPENDENT AI RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONUNITED STATES / SIGNAL EI–001
OBSERVE. TEST. UNDERSTAND.

Independent
research for
safer intelligence.

We study how AI systems learn and behave. Through controlled experiments, we investigate how their capabilities develop and where their behavior becomes unreliable.

FIG. 01 — A SIGNAL WORTH STUDYING.CRT / TEST PATTERN
RESEARCH NETWORK / TRANSMITTINGSCROLL TO OBSERVE ↓RUN TIME 00:00:00
THE EMERGING SIGNAL OF MACHINE INTELLIGENCE.CAREFULLY. EMPIRICALLY. DELIBERATELY.
CH 01 / THE INSTITUTE

Intelligence should be
studied before it is trusted.

Inside the Institute ↗

Empirical Institute is an independent research organization dedicated to the empirical study of artificial intelligence.

We use controlled environments and behavioral evaluations to study how AI systems change as they learn. Our questions concern uncertainty, cooperation, adaptation, and failure: what changes, under which conditions, and how can we measure it?

The aim is practical: methods and evidence that help researchers identify safety problems during development.

CH 02 / RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY

Study intelligence
while it develops.

Much of AI safety evaluates systems after significant capabilities already exist. We examine intelligence as a developing system — observing learning trajectories, uncertainty, cooperation, adaptation, and failure before behaviors become deeply embedded.

01 /

Development

Study how capabilities and behaviors emerge over time.

02 /

Environment

Use controlled simulated environments to observe learning and adaptation.

03 /

Measurement

Identify behavioral patterns, uncertainty, and emerging capabilities.

FOUR CONNECTED RESEARCH PROGRAMS

Four programs,
one research agenda.

Our work connects behavioral evaluation, developmental learning, simulated environments, and curriculum design.

OPEN QUESTIONS / ONGOING INQUIRY

What should we measure before
intelligence becomes more capable?

“

When does a model begin to recognize uncertainty?

01 / 07
EXPERIMENTAL INTERFACE

Signal study.

An illustration of the observation interface.
Illustrative simulation — not live research data.

EI-SIM-001 / CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTILLUSTRATIVE SIGNAL
AGENTS04
ITERATION01842
SIGNALNOMINAL
UNCERTAINTYOBSERVED
OUR METHOD

Evidence before assumption.

Empirical Institute favors measurable evidence over speculation.

01 —

Observe

Identify behavior or capability worth understanding.

02 —

Isolate

Create controlled experimental conditions.

03 —

Test

Expose intelligent systems to structured environments and tasks.

04 —

Measure

Collect behavioral and performance evidence.

05 —

Understand

Develop hypotheses about why the observed behavior emerged.

CH 07 / PUBLICATIONS

An open record of inquiry.

Research papers, experiments, tools, and observations from our work.

▤

Research archive in development.

Future research outputs appear here as they become available.

ARCHIVE / STANDBY
CH 08 / PEOPLE

Across disciplines.
Around a shared question.

Empirical Institute brings together researchers, technologists, scientists, and interdisciplinary thinkers interested in understanding how intelligence develops.

Work With Us ↗
FOUNDER

Eric Choi

Founder, Empirical Institute

Eric Choi founded Empirical Institute to investigate a fundamental question in AI safety: Can we build safer AI not only by constraining it, but by changing how it learns?

His work sits at the intersection of artificial intelligence, machine learning, psychology, behavioral science, and entrepreneurship. Agnostic Ally grew from his interest in applying ideas from human development and learning to AI alignment—not by assuming AI thinks or feels like a person, but by measuring whether different environments produce different outcomes.

“We don't have to know whether an AI can feel in order to ask whether the way we train it changes what it becomes.”
FOUNDING TEAM

Eric Cosentino

Founding team member, Empirical Institute

Mathematical Strategist | Game Theory in AI & Cybersecurity | Adversarial Systems Modeling

Former mathematics teacher bringing a mathematical and strategic perspective to the institute’s research into artificial-agent behavior. His work focuses on applying game theory, adversarial systems modeling, and mathematical reasoning to AI and cybersecurity, including how intelligent agents behave under competition, cooperation, uncertainty, conflicting incentives, and adversarial pressure.

At Empirical Institute, this perspective supports the design of developmental games, multi-agent environments, adversarial experiments, and quantitative frameworks for measuring behavioral change.

SHARED INQUIRY / COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING

Research is a
collaborative process.

We are interested in collaborating with researchers, universities, laboratories, foundations, technologists, and institutions working on artificial intelligence, machine learning, AI safety, developmental learning, evaluation, simulation, and related fields.

SUPPORT EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Independent inquiry takes long-term support.

Empirical Institute welcomes conversations with foundations, research partners, grantmakers, philanthropic organizations, and institutions interested in advancing rigorous AI safety research.

Support the Institute
CH 09 / CONTACT

Open a channel.

Research questions, collaborations, and conversations about what comes next.

RESEARCH NETWORK / SIGNAL ACTIVE
UNITED STATES

By submitting, you agree to our privacy policy.